| Rural fires were an even more persistent scourge in late imperial Russia than famine, as Cathy Frierson shows in this first comprehensive study. Destroying almost three billion rublesí worth of property in European Russia between 1860 and 1904, accidental and arson fires acted as a brake on Russiaís economic development while subjecting peasants to perennial shocks to their physical and emotional condition. The fire question captured the attention of educated, progressive Russians, who came to perceive the peasants, especially female peasants, as key obstacles to Russiaís becoming a rational, modern society in the European model. Using sources ranging from literary representations and newspaper articles to statistical tables and court records from regional archives, Frierson demonstrates the many meanings fire held for both peasants and the educated elite. To peasants, it was an essential source of light and warmth as well as a destructive force that regularly ignited their cramped villages of wooden, thatch-roofed huts. Absent the rule of law, they often used arson to gain justice or revenge, or to exert social control over those who would violate village norms. Frierson shows that the vast majority of arson cases in European Russia were not peasant-against-gentry acts of protest but peasant-against-peasant acts of "self-help" law or plain spite. Both the state and individual progressives set out to resolve the fire question and to educate, cajole, or coerce the peasantry into the modern world. Mandatory fire insurance, building codes, "scientific" village layouts, and volunteer firefighting brigades reduced the average number of buildings consumed in each blaze, but none of these measures succeeded in curbing the number of fires each year.
|
Larger Image
Other titles you may be interested:
