|
|
The question of what constitutes sexual harassment--from suggestive remarks to outright threats, from off-color jokes to lewd posters on office walls--is contentious, as is the question of how to address sexual harassment. Do all instances of sexual harassment constitute sex discrimination? Are some instances merely sexual attraction gone wrong? Do social policies aimed at eliminating sexual harassment in the workplace violate freedom of expression or do they make working relationships possible between women and men? In this uncompromising yet respectful debate, two philosophers of widely divergent views present clear arguments and then respond directly to each other's reasoning. LeMonchek argues for a feminist perspective on sexual harassment that is sensitive to the politics of gender. Hajdin contends that this perspective is both morally confusing and legally problematic, and that sexual harassment can be better addressed by traditional moral and legal categories.
|
Add
Your Review!
Read more reviews from Amazon.com or Barnes&Noble.com
|
|
|
|
|
Other titles you may be interested:
|
|
|
» Add BookFinder4U to your browser's Favorites
» Add BookFinder4U to your online bookmarks:  |
Page loading time: 2.75 sec. | URL: http://www.bookfinder4u.com/detail/0847684253.html
©2008 BookFinder4U.com
Compare 130 bookstores - All rights Reserved.
Disclaim: Part of content on this site is properties of their respective
owners and copyright holders. Bookfinder4u will not under any circumstances
be liable to you or any other person for any loss due to the use of these
content. Some of the content that we make available to you through this
website comes from amazon web services. All such content is provided to
you "as is." this content and your use of it are subject to
change and/or removal at any time.
Privacy
Commitment Conditions of Use
|